State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City vs Sanghapal Sudam Gawai Advocate - Gawai Dr. Mohan Sopan — 18/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,(2)(N),363,306,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010004452023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
171/2023
Filing Date
14-03-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
14-03-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
991
Police Station
WASHIM CITY
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City
Adv. A. P. P. Washim
Respondent(s)
Sanghapal Sudam Gawai Advocate - Gawai Dr. Mohan Sopan
Hearing History
Judge: 12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanghpal Gawai (Sessions Trial 18/2023) The Sessions Judge rejected the informant's application for further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The informant had sought re-investigation into a death case, alleging the IO failed to properly investigate, arrest alleged accomplices, record witness statements, and collect call data records (CDR/SDR). The court found no credible grounds warranting further investigation, noting the informant failed to provide specific witness details, lapsed time (3 years), and availability of alternative legal remedies through prosecution's existing CDR/SDR evidence and procedural options for adding accused persons during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanghpal Gawai (Sessions Trial 18/2023) The Sessions Judge rejected the informant's application for further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The informant had sought re-investigation into a death case, alleging the IO failed to properly investigate, arrest alleged accomplices, record witness statements, and collect call data records (CDR/SDR). The court found no credible grounds warranting further investigation, noting the informant failed to provide specific witness details, lapsed time (3 years), and availability of alternative legal remedies through prosecution's existing CDR/SDR evidence and procedural options for adding accused persons during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts