State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod vs Ganesh Nivruti Narwade — 33/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010004192025
Filing Number
239/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Nivruti Narwade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 18-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ganesh Nivrutti Narwade (33/2025) The Sessions Court in Washim acquitted Ganesh Nivrutti Narwade of charges under Section 103(1) BNS (culpable homicide) in the death of his father. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the deceased, determining instead that a fall from a nearby well was the probable cause of death. Key factors in the acquittal included: inconsistent eyewitness testimony (the primary witness recanted crucial claims during cross-examination), postmortem findings compatible with a fall from 5 feet rather than deliberate assault, a 4-5 hour delay in reporting the incident, and the accused's immediate denial of involvement. The court also noted the accused suffers from mental illness requiring care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ganesh Nivrutti Narwade (33/2025) The Sessions Court in Washim acquitted Ganesh Nivrutti Narwade of charges under Section 103(1) BNS (culpable homicide) in the death of his father. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the deceased, determining instead that a fall from a nearby well was the probable cause of death. Key factors in the acquittal included: inconsistent eyewitness testimony (the primary witness recanted crucial claims during cross-examination), postmortem findings compatible with a fall from 5 feet rather than deliberate assault, a 4-5 hour delay in reporting the incident, and the accused's immediate denial of involvement. The court also noted the accused suffers from mental illness requiring care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts