Vijay Atmaram Changade vs Jyoti Vijay Changade Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao — 17/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHWS010003972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-06-2024

Filing Number

229/2025

Filing Date

19-04-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

22-04-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29

Petitioner(s)

Vijay Atmaram Changade

Adv. BALI VIJAY KESHAV

Gajanan Atmaram Changade

Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA

Sumanbai Atmaram Changade

Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA

Seema Gajanan Changade

Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA

Respondent(s)

Jyoti Vijay Changade Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao

Shruti Vijay Changade

Hearing History

Judge: 12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Hearing

24-03-2026

Hearing

17-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 17/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the appellants' appeal, quashing the trial court's domestic violence judgment and remanding the case for fresh adjudication. The court found the appellants were prevented by sufficient reason (COVID-19 lockdown and distance) from filing their written statement and deserved an opportunity to contest on merits. Key Reasoning: While the trial court had established domestic violence—harassment over inability to bear a son, confiscation of gold ornaments, and eviction in January 2018—the appellants' procedural non-participation was excused due to pandemic-related court closures and geographic distance. The court maintained interim maintenance orders (₹5,000/month for the wife, ₹2,000 for the 8-year-old daughter) pending retrial, protecting respondents from hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 17/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the appellants' appeal, quashing the trial court's domestic violence judgment and remanding the case for fresh adjudication. The court found the appellants were prevented by sufficient reason (COVID-19 lockdown and distance) from filing their written statement and deserved an opportunity to contest on merits. Key Reasoning: While the trial court had established domestic violence—harassment over inability to bear a son, confiscation of gold ornaments, and eviction in January 2018—the appellants' procedural non-participation was excused due to pandemic-related court closures and geographic distance. The court maintained interim maintenance orders (₹5,000/month for the wife, ₹2,000 for the 8-year-old daughter) pending retrial, protecting respondents from hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case