Vijay Atmaram Changade vs Jyoti Vijay Changade Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao — 17/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHWS010003972025
e-Filing Number
24-06-2024
Filing Number
229/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
22-04-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay Atmaram Changade
Adv. BALI VIJAY KESHAV
Gajanan Atmaram Changade
Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA
Sumanbai Atmaram Changade
Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA
Seema Gajanan Changade
Adv. PHATAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Jyoti Vijay Changade Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao
Shruti Vijay Changade
Hearing History
Judge: 12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 17/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the appellants' appeal, quashing the trial court's domestic violence judgment and remanding the case for fresh adjudication. The court found the appellants were prevented by sufficient reason (COVID-19 lockdown and distance) from filing their written statement and deserved an opportunity to contest on merits. Key Reasoning: While the trial court had established domestic violence—harassment over inability to bear a son, confiscation of gold ornaments, and eviction in January 2018—the appellants' procedural non-participation was excused due to pandemic-related court closures and geographic distance. The court maintained interim maintenance orders (₹5,000/month for the wife, ₹2,000 for the 8-year-old daughter) pending retrial, protecting respondents from hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 17/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the appellants' appeal, quashing the trial court's domestic violence judgment and remanding the case for fresh adjudication. The court found the appellants were prevented by sufficient reason (COVID-19 lockdown and distance) from filing their written statement and deserved an opportunity to contest on merits. Key Reasoning: While the trial court had established domestic violence—harassment over inability to bear a son, confiscation of gold ornaments, and eviction in January 2018—the appellants' procedural non-participation was excused due to pandemic-related court closures and geographic distance. The court maintained interim maintenance orders (₹5,000/month for the wife, ₹2,000 for the 8-year-old daughter) pending retrial, protecting respondents from hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts