State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City vs Shubham Anil Daliya Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR — 30/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,272,273,328. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHWS010003502024

Case disposed

Filing Number

172/2024

Filing Date

08-04-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

08-04-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim

Decision Date

12th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

530

Police Station

WASHIM CITY

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 188,272,273,328
Food Safety and Standards Act,2006 Section 59

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Shubham Anil Daliya Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR

Ketan Shamlal Mundhare

Hearing History

Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim

12-06-2026

Disposed

09-06-2026

Arguments

01-06-2026

Arguments

29-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

28-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

12-06-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Sessions Case 30/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, acquitted both accused—Shubham Anil Daliya and Ketan Shyamlal Mundhare—of charges under Sections 328, 272, 273, 188 IPC and Section 59(i) of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court noted critical gaps in prosecution evidence: one key witness turned hostile, the investigating officer provided no description of seized articles, the chemical analysis report did not confirm poisonous substances, and the government notification allegedly violated was neither produced nor proved, leaving the prosecution case riddled with reasonable doubt that entitled the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 30/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, acquitted both accused—Shubham Anil Daliya and Ketan Shyamlal Mundhare—of charges under Sections 328, 272, 273, 188 IPC and Section 59(i) of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court noted critical gaps in prosecution evidence: one key witness turned hostile, the investigating officer provided no description of seized articles, the chemical analysis report did not confirm poisonous substances, and the government notification allegedly violated was neither produced nor proved, leaving the prosecution case riddled with reasonable doubt that entitled the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case