State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City vs Shubham Anil Daliya Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR — 30/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,272,273,328. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHWS010003502024

Filing Number

172/2024

Filing Date

08-Apr-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

08-Apr-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

530

Police Station

WASHIM CITY

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 188,272,273,328
Food Safety and Standards Act,2006 Section 59

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim City

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Anil Daliya Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR

  2. 2.Ketan Shamlal Mundhare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case 30/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, acquitted both accused—Shubham Anil Daliya and Ketan Shyamlal Mundhare—of charges under Sections 328, 272, 273, 188 IPC and Section 59(i) of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court noted critical gaps in prosecution evidence: one key witness turned hostile, the investigating officer provided no description of seized articles, the chemical analysis report did not confirm poisonous substances, and the government notification allegedly violated was neither produced nor proved, leaving the prosecution case riddled with reasonable doubt that entitled the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  6. 29-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  7. 28-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  12. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  18. 11-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  20. 18-Jun-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  21. 19-May-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  22. 05-Mar-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  24. 08-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  25. 29-Jul-2024

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  26. 20-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 08-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 30/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, acquitted both accused—Shubham Anil Daliya and Ketan Shyamlal Mundhare—of charges under Sections 328, 272, 273, 188 IPC and Section 59(i) of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court noted critical gaps in prosecution evidence: one key witness turned hostile, the investigating officer provided no description of seized articles, the chemical analysis report did not confirm poisonous substances, and the government notification allegedly violated was neither produced nor proved, leaving the prosecution case riddled with reasonable doubt that entitled the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case