Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar vs State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City — 88/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHWS010003032026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

981

Police Station

WASHIM CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar

Adv. GAWALI VISHNU JAGANNATH

Respondent(s)

1.State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
30-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar v. State (88/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, rejected Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar's anticipatory bail application on 30/03/2026. The applicant was accused of falsely identifying a property vendor before the Sub Registrar, enabling execution of a fraudulent sale deed for a disputed plot that was sold four times between August-November 2025 through forgery. The court found his role "major at par with vendor and vendee" and held this was not a fit case for anticipatory bail given the serious nature of offences (including Section 338 BNS punishable with life imprisonment) and evidence of conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
30-Mar-2026

Disposed

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
25-Mar-2026

Hearing

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
24-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
23-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
20-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
18-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
16-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar v. State (88/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, rejected Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar's anticipatory bail application on 30/03/2026. The applicant was accused of falsely identifying a property vendor before the Sub Registrar, enabling execution of a fraudulent sale deed for a disputed plot that was sold four times between August-November 2025 through forgery. The court found his role "major at par with vendor and vendee" and held this was not a fit case for anticipatory bail given the serious nature of offences (including Section 338 BNS punishable with life imprisonment) and evidence of conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.