Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural — 84/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHWS010002912026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

165/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

84/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

161

Police Station

WASHIM RURAL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod

Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM

Waman Mangusing Rathod

Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural

Complainant

Hearing History

Judge: 11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Order

25-03-2026

Order

24-03-2026

Order

23-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod and Waman Mangusing Rathod, finding prima facie evidence of offences under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS sections for allegedly assaulting an ST community informant and her family members with a wooden stick while using abusive language, and for insulting Birsa Munda. The court determined that arrest and custodial interrogation were necessary given the serious nature of accusations, the ongoing investigation, and the applicants' residence in the same village as the informant, thereby warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod and Waman Mangusing Rathod, finding prima facie evidence of offences under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS sections for allegedly assaulting an ST community informant and her family members with a wooden stick while using abusive language, and for insulting Birsa Munda. The court determined that arrest and custodial interrogation were necessary given the serious nature of accusations, the ongoing investigation, and the applicants' residence in the same village as the informant, thereby warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case