Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural — 84/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWS010002912026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
165/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
84/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
161
Police Station
WASHIM RURAL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Waman Mangusing Rathod
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural
Complainant
Hearing History
Judge: 11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod and Waman Mangusing Rathod, finding prima facie evidence of offences under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS sections for allegedly assaulting an ST community informant and her family members with a wooden stick while using abusive language, and for insulting Birsa Munda. The court determined that arrest and custodial interrogation were necessary given the serious nature of accusations, the ongoing investigation, and the applicants' residence in the same village as the informant, thereby warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ranjit Bhimrav Rathod and Waman Mangusing Rathod, finding prima facie evidence of offences under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS sections for allegedly assaulting an ST community informant and her family members with a wooden stick while using abusive language, and for insulting Birsa Munda. The court determined that arrest and custodial interrogation were necessary given the serious nature of accusations, the ongoing investigation, and the applicants' residence in the same village as the informant, thereby warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts