Umesh Ananta Chavhan vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod — 82/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWS010002782026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
163/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
82/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
192
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umesh Ananta Chavhan
Adv. BALI VIJAY KESHAV
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 10-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Umesh Ananta Chavhan v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.B.A. No. 82/2026) The court granted bail to Umesh Ananta Chavhan, accused of eloping with a minor girl with marriage promise under BNS sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5). The Additional Sessions Judge found that most investigation was complete, victim statements recorded, and the accused had been in custody since February 27, 2026, warranting release on stringent conditions. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, requiring weekly police station attendance, no contact with complainant/victim, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Umesh Ananta Chavhan v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.B.A. No. 82/2026) The court granted bail to Umesh Ananta Chavhan, accused of eloping with a minor girl with marriage promise under BNS sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5). The Additional Sessions Judge found that most investigation was complete, victim statements recorded, and the accused had been in custody since February 27, 2026, warranting release on stringent conditions. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, requiring weekly police station attendance, no contact with complainant/victim, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts