State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City vs Pravin Gajanan Muthal Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao — 22/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.
Spl.Case ACB - Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act
CNR: MHWS010002772026
Filing Number
162/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
719
Police Station
WASHIM CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pravin Gajanan Muthal Advocate - Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao
Case History
-
10-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Charge
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Apr-2026
Charge
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Spl. ACB Case No. 22/2026 Bail application of Pravin Gajanan Muthal, charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, was ALLOWED. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with one solvent surety of equal amount, noting the accused cooperated during investigation, was never arrested, and all evidence is documentary. Conditions imposed include prohibition on tampering with evidence, contacting witnesses, and furnishing address proof documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2026
Case Summary: Spl. ACB Case No. 22/2026 Bail application of Pravin Gajanan Muthal, charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, was ALLOWED. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with one solvent surety of equal amount, noting the accused cooperated during investigation, was never arrested, and all evidence is documentary. Conditions imposed include prohibition on tampering with evidence, contacting witnesses, and furnishing address proof documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts