Nisha Sadanand Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod — 79/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWS010002722026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nisha Sadanand Gaikwad
Adv. TAVSHIFUDDIN KAISARUDDIN
Anusaya Dagadu Gaikwad
Adv. TAVSHIFUDDIN KAISARUDDIN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order |
| 27-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to Nisha Sadanand Gaikwad and Anusaya Dagadu Gaikwad in a case involving alleged abuse and threats during a tax collection dispute. The judge found that since the co-accused was already released on bail, both parties had filed mutual complaints, and the applicants offered full cooperation, they deserved bail on a PR Bond of Rs.25,000 each with conditions to cooperate with investigators and refrain from contacting the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to Nisha Sadanand Gaikwad and Anusaya Dagadu Gaikwad in a case involving alleged abuse and threats during a tax collection dispute. The judge found that since the co-accused was already released on bail, both parties had filed mutual complaints, and the applicants offered full cooperation, they deserved bail on a PR Bond of Rs.25,000 each with conditions to cooperate with investigators and refrain from contacting the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts