Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabuddhe vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon — 78/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWS010002702026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
156/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
164
Police Station
MALEGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabuddhe
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabudhe v. State of Maharashtra (Bail Application 78/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim granted bail to 18-year-old Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabudhe, accused of rape and sexual assault under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found that investigation was nearly complete, no further custody was required, the applicant had no criminal history, and prolonged detention could harm his future. The court addressed prosecution and victim concerns—regarding witness tampering and victim intimidation—by imposing strict bail conditions: Rs. 50,000 bond with surety, weekly police station attendance, prohibition from entering victim's village, no contact with witnesses, and address restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabudhe v. State of Maharashtra (Bail Application 78/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim granted bail to 18-year-old Anurag Chandrakant Sahastrabudhe, accused of rape and sexual assault under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found that investigation was nearly complete, no further custody was required, the applicant had no criminal history, and prolonged detention could harm his future. The court addressed prosecution and victim concerns—regarding witness tampering and victim intimidation—by imposing strict bail conditions: Rs. 50,000 bond with surety, weekly police station attendance, prohibition from entering victim's village, no contact with witnesses, and address restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts