Chaya Ganesh Kad vs Ganesh Shamrao Kad Advocate - Shaikh Zahir Gafoor — 15/2019
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010002562019
Filing Number
132/2019
Filing Date
13-02-2019
Registration No
15/2019
Registration Date
13-02-2019
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chaya Ganesh Kad
Adv. Gawali Ravindra Shamrao
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Shamrao Kad Advocate - Shaikh Zahir Gafoor
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chaya Ganesh Kad v. Ganesh Shamrao Kad (15/2019) The District Judge partially allowed the appellant's (wife's) appeal and set aside the trial court's divorce decree. The judge found that the respondent (husband) failed to properly plead that a criminal case (Section 498A) filed by the wife resulted in acquittal, which is essential to establish mental cruelty as grounds for divorce. Following precedent (*Darshana v. Alok*), the court held that both grounds for divorce—cruelty and desertion—could not be decided on merit without complete pleadings. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh decision, allowing both parties to amend their pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chaya Ganesh Kad v. Ganesh Shamrao Kad (15/2019) The District Judge partially allowed the appellant's (wife's) appeal and set aside the trial court's divorce decree. The judge found that the respondent (husband) failed to properly plead that a criminal case (Section 498A) filed by the wife resulted in acquittal, which is essential to establish mental cruelty as grounds for divorce. Following precedent (*Darshana v. Alok*), the court held that both grounds for divorce—cruelty and desertion—could not be decided on merit without complete pleadings. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh decision, allowing both parties to amend their pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts