Shaikh Rafik Shaikh Hasan vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon — 73/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWS010002512026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
140/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
73/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
643
Police Station
MALEGAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Rafik Shaikh Hasan
Adv. Shaikh Zahir Gafoor
Shaikh Hamid Shaikh Hasan
Adv. Akshay Suresh Raut
Shaikh Rashid Shaikh Hasan
Adv. Akshay Suresh Raut
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 11-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 73/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by three applicants (Shaikh Rafik, Shaikh Hamid, and Shaikh Rashid) accused of serious assault. The applicants were charged with assaulting an informant and his son using weapons including stones and iron pipes during a neighborhood dispute. The court found the accusations well-founded with specific roles attributed to each applicant, noted ongoing investigations with other accused still absconding, and observed that the informant's family had fled due to threats, warranting arrest and custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 73/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by three applicants (Shaikh Rafik, Shaikh Hamid, and Shaikh Rashid) accused of serious assault. The applicants were charged with assaulting an informant and his son using weapons including stones and iron pipes during a neighborhood dispute. The court found the accusations well-founded with specific roles attributed to each applicant, noted ongoing investigations with other accused still absconding, and observed that the informant's family had fled due to threats, warranting arrest and custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts