Vyankati Kisan Sadar vs Arun Ganpat Kolhe Advocate - Kalwar Deepak Rameshchandra — 9/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHWS010002342024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2024

Filing Number

143/2024

Filing Date

04-03-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

06-03-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96

Petitioner(s)

Vyankati Kisan Sadar

Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI

Deepak Vyankati Sadar

Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI

Shivaji Vyankati Sadar

Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI

Respondent(s)

Arun Ganpat Kolhe Advocate - Kalwar Deepak Rameshchandra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Judgment

16-03-2026

Judgment

05-03-2026

Arguments

13-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Vyankati and others v. Arun Ganpat Kolhe (9/2024) The Principal District Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, upholding their possession of agricultural land acquired via registered sale-deed dated 30/03/2011. The court confirmed the plaintiff's ownership and granted injunction against obstruction, but modified the trial court's blanket injunction to clarify that defendants retain rights to pursue legal remedies through due process of law, excluding self-help measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vyankati and others v. Arun Ganpat Kolhe (9/2024) The Principal District Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, upholding their possession of agricultural land acquired via registered sale-deed dated 30/03/2011. The court confirmed the plaintiff's ownership and granted injunction against obstruction, but modified the trial court's blanket injunction to clarify that defendants retain rights to pursue legal remedies through due process of law, excluding self-help measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case