Vyankati Kisan Sadar vs Arun Ganpat Kolhe Advocate - Kalwar Deepak Rameshchandra — 9/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010002342024
e-Filing Number
04-03-2024
Filing Number
143/2024
Filing Date
04-Mar-2024
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
06-Mar-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vyankati Kisan Sadar
Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI
-
2.Deepak Vyankati Sadar
Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI
-
3.Shivaji Vyankati Sadar
Adv. GAURAV VINODKUMAR BIYANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arun Ganpat Kolhe Advocate - Kalwar Deepak Rameshchandra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Vyankati and others v. Arun Ganpat Kolhe (9/2024) The Principal District Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, upholding their possession of agricultural land acquired via registered sale-deed dated 30/03/2011. The court confirmed the plaintiff's ownership and granted injunction against obstruction, but modified the trial court's blanket injunction to clarify that defendants retain rights to pursue legal remedies through due process of law, excluding self-help measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
31-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
28-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
29-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
19-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
18-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-May-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-Mar-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
03-Feb-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
18-Dec-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Nov-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
03-Oct-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
22-Aug-2024
Awaiting R and P Lower Court
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Aug-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
03-Jul-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Jun-2024
No Say Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-May-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2024
Case Summary: Vyankati and others v. Arun Ganpat Kolhe (9/2024) The Principal District Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, upholding their possession of agricultural land acquired via registered sale-deed dated 30/03/2011. The court confirmed the plaintiff's ownership and granted injunction against obstruction, but modified the trial court's blanket injunction to clarify that defendants retain rights to pursue legal remedies through due process of law, excluding self-help measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts