State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural vs Ramdas Ashok Dhongade Advocate - deshmuh — 11/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010002152024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
87/2024
Filing Date
28-02-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
28-02-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
532
Police Station
WASHIM RURAL
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural
Adv. Misar Madhuri Tannalal
Respondent(s)
Ramdas Ashok Dhongade Advocate - deshmuh
Rahul Gajanan Karwate
Adv. M. G. Deshmukh
Omkar Namdev Raut
Adv. M. G. Deshmukh
Manish Ramhari Bhoyar
Adv. M. G. Deshmukh
Bhushan Shamsundar Barhate
Adv. Shaikh Zahir Gafoor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, allowed Ramdas Ashok Dhongade's application for interim custody of a seized Pulsar 150 DTS-I vehicle (registration MH-37-Y-8532). The vehicle was released on supratnama (custody receipt) upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot transfer or alter the vehicle's identity without court permission and must produce it when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, allowed Ramdas Ashok Dhongade's application for interim custody of a seized Pulsar 150 DTS-I vehicle (registration MH-37-Y-8532). The vehicle was released on supratnama (custody receipt) upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot transfer or alter the vehicle's identity without court permission and must produce it when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts