State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural vs Prabhu Panduji Kale Advocate - Shelke Santosh Dnyanbarao — 19/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,147,148,149,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHWS010001172021

Filing Number

72/2021

Filing Date

25-Jan-2021

Registration No

19/2021

Registration Date

25-Jan-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

WASHIM RURAL

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,147,148,149,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prabhu Panduji Kale Advocate - Shelke Santosh Dnyanbarao

  2. 2.Sindhu Prabhu Kale

  3. 3.Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale

  4. 4.Arun Prabhu Kale

  5. 5.Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale

  6. 6.Nirmala @ Mina Arun Kale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 19/2021 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted all six accused (Prabhu Panduji Kale, Sindhu Prabhu Kale, Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale, Arun Prabhu Kale, Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale, and Nirmala Arun Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 326, 504, 506 r/w 149, finding the prosecution failed to establish assault allegations. Key Reasoning: The complainant and injured witnesses (PW-4, PW-5, PW-6) did not support the prosecution's case; panch witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding evidence collection; and investigating officers' technical evidence provided no corroboration. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence and held the complainant's own testimony indicated he fell on stairs during heated talks rather than being assaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  5. 29-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  6. 15-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  7. 06-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  8. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  10. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  12. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  16. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  18. 10-Oct-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  21. 27-Jun-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  22. 16-May-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  23. 03-Mar-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  24. 14-Jan-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  25. 23-Dec-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  26. 26-Nov-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  27. 19-Sep-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  28. 30-Jul-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  29. 22-May-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  30. 18-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  32. 25-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  33. 03-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  34. 27-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  35. 09-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  36. 28-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  37. 05-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  38. 24-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  39. 03-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  40. 04-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  41. 15-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  42. 20-May-2022

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  43. 31-Mar-2022

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  44. 10-Feb-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  45. 20-Dec-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  46. 09-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  47. 14-Sep-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  48. 14-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  49. 07-May-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  50. 09-Mar-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  51. 29-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 25-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 19/2021 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted all six accused (Prabhu Panduji Kale, Sindhu Prabhu Kale, Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale, Arun Prabhu Kale, Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale, and Nirmala Arun Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 326, 504, 506 r/w 149, finding the prosecution failed to establish assault allegations. Key Reasoning: The complainant and injured witnesses (PW-4, PW-5, PW-6) did not support the prosecution's case; panch witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding evidence collection; and investigating officers' technical evidence provided no corroboration. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence and held the complainant's own testimony indicated he fell on stairs during heated talks rather than being assaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case