State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural vs Prabhu Panduji Kale Advocate - Shelke Santosh Dnyanbarao — 19/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,147,148,149,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010001172021
Filing Number
72/2021
Filing Date
25-01-2021
Registration No
19/2021
Registration Date
25-01-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
WASHIM RURAL
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Washim Rural
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Prabhu Panduji Kale Advocate - Shelke Santosh Dnyanbarao
Sindhu Prabhu Kale
Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale
Arun Prabhu Kale
Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale
Nirmala @ Mina Arun Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Disposed
B.W._Unready
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-06-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 29-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 15-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 19/2021 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted all six accused (Prabhu Panduji Kale, Sindhu Prabhu Kale, Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale, Arun Prabhu Kale, Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale, and Nirmala Arun Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 326, 504, 506 r/w 149, finding the prosecution failed to establish assault allegations. Key Reasoning: The complainant and injured witnesses (PW-4, PW-5, PW-6) did not support the prosecution's case; panch witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding evidence collection; and investigating officers' technical evidence provided no corroboration. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence and held the complainant's own testimony indicated he fell on stairs during heated talks rather than being assaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 19/2021 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted all six accused (Prabhu Panduji Kale, Sindhu Prabhu Kale, Shrikrushna Prabhu Kale, Arun Prabhu Kale, Kalpana Shrikrushna Kale, and Nirmala Arun Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 326, 504, 506 r/w 149, finding the prosecution failed to establish assault allegations. Key Reasoning: The complainant and injured witnesses (PW-4, PW-5, PW-6) did not support the prosecution's case; panch witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding evidence collection; and investigating officers' technical evidence provided no corroboration. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence and held the complainant's own testimony indicated he fell on stairs during heated talks rather than being assaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts