Bhagwat Kashinath Raut (Teli) vs Chandrakant Rambhau Salwe Advocate - BELOKAR KISHOR PRABHACHANDRA — 4/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010000962023
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
70/2023
Filing Date
16-01-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
16-01-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagwat Kashinath Raut (Teli)
Adv. DESHPANDE AVINASH RAMKRISHNA
Satyabhama Kashinath Raut (Teli)
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Rambhau Salwe Advocate - BELOKAR KISHOR PRABHACHANDRA
Vijay Rambhau Salwe
Rajendra Rambhau Salwe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 4/2023 Outcome: Stay granted. The appellants' application to stay execution of the trial court's decree in the property possession suit was allowed. The trial court's order and decree in Special Civil Suit No. 5/2019 are stayed pending final disposal of the appeal. Key Finding: The court found appellants had a prima facie case, were in possession of the suit property with standing crops, and would suffer irreparable loss without the stay, while respondents would suffer no loss if stay was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 4/2023 Outcome: Stay granted. The appellants' application to stay execution of the trial court's decree in the property possession suit was allowed. The trial court's order and decree in Special Civil Suit No. 5/2019 are stayed pending final disposal of the appeal. Key Finding: The court found appellants had a prima facie case, were in possession of the suit property with standing crops, and would suffer irreparable loss without the stay, while respondents would suffer no loss if stay was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts