State of Maharashtra through PSO Joulka vs Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune Advocate - Deshmukh Rajabhau Nilkanthrao — 4/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,120 (B). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010000912024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
31/2024
Filing Date
22-01-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
22-01-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
301
Police Station
JAULKA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Joulka
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune Advocate - Deshmukh Rajabhau Nilkanthrao
Satish Ramdas Sonune
Adv. Chief LADC SHELKE PARMESHWAR ATMARAM
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune (4/2024) Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune's bail application for murder, destruction of evidence, and criminal conspiracy charges was rejected on 05/09/2024. The court found prima-facie evidence of his involvement in assaulting and burning victim Dilip Dhonduji Sonune, determined he posed a risk of witness tampering, and noted material witnesses remained to be examined. The case, based on circumstantial evidence with charges already framed, was deemed unsuitable for bail release at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune (4/2024) Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Sonune's bail application for murder, destruction of evidence, and criminal conspiracy charges was rejected on 05/09/2024. The court found prima-facie evidence of his involvement in assaulting and burning victim Dilip Dhonduji Sonune, determined he posed a risk of witness tampering, and noted material witnesses remained to be examined. The case, based on circumstantial evidence with charges already framed, was deemed unsuitable for bail release at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts