Anusayabai Laxman Bondre vs Prayagbai Kailas Chhavan — 9/2024
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS010000862024
e-Filing Number
19-01-2024
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
19-Jan-2024
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
23-Jan-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anusayabai Laxman Bondre
Adv. GAIKWAD SUDHARSHAN GAJANAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prayagbai Kailas Chhavan
-
2.Devanand Laxman Bondre
-
3.Gayabai Shantiram Bhosale
-
4.Yamunabai Kisanrao Kadam
-
5.Kamalabai Babanrao Devkar
-
6.Yamunabai Vishnu Bondre
-
7.Ankush Vishnu Bondre
-
8.Radhika Vishnu Bondre
-
9.Ganesh Vishnu Bondre
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Civil MA No. 9/2024 Anusayabai sought condonation of delay (2513 days) to restore an appeal dismissed in default on 15/04/2017. She alleged her son Devanand misled her by claiming the appeal was pending while colluding with the opposing party. The court rejected her application, finding she failed to establish "just and sufficient cause." The court noted that Anusayabai herself actively participated in the original trial, filed written statements, and was aware of execution proceedings filed in 2022, undermining her claim of ignorance. The judgment emphasized that parties must diligently pursue their cases and that long inaction demonstrates negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
21-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
12-Jun-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
15-Apr-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Mar-2025
Hearing
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
02-Jan-2025
No W.S. Order
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Dec-2024
No W.S. Order
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Oct-2024
No W.S. Order
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Aug-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
19-Jul-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
02-Apr-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
05-Mar-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
25-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2024
Case Summary: Civil MA No. 9/2024 Anusayabai sought condonation of delay (2513 days) to restore an appeal dismissed in default on 15/04/2017. She alleged her son Devanand misled her by claiming the appeal was pending while colluding with the opposing party. The court rejected her application, finding she failed to establish "just and sufficient cause." The court noted that Anusayabai herself actively participated in the original trial, filed written statements, and was aware of execution proceedings filed in 2022, undermining her claim of ignorance. The judgment emphasized that parties must diligently pursue their cases and that long inaction demonstrates negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts