Anusayabai Laxman Bondre vs Prayagbai Kailas Chhavan — 9/2024

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS010000862024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-01-2024

Filing Number

59/2024

Filing Date

19-01-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

23-01-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Anusayabai Laxman Bondre

Adv. GAIKWAD SUDHARSHAN GAJANAN

Respondent(s)

Prayagbai Kailas Chhavan

Devanand Laxman Bondre

Gayabai Shantiram Bhosale

Yamunabai Kisanrao Kadam

Kamalabai Babanrao Devkar

Yamunabai Vishnu Bondre

Ankush Vishnu Bondre

Radhika Vishnu Bondre

Ganesh Vishnu Bondre

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Civil MA No. 9/2024 Anusayabai sought condonation of delay (2513 days) to restore an appeal dismissed in default on 15/04/2017. She alleged her son Devanand misled her by claiming the appeal was pending while colluding with the opposing party. The court rejected her application, finding she failed to establish "just and sufficient cause." The court noted that Anusayabai herself actively participated in the original trial, filed written statements, and was aware of execution proceedings filed in 2022, undermining her claim of ignorance. The judgment emphasized that parties must diligently pursue their cases and that long inaction demonstrates negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil MA No. 9/2024 Anusayabai sought condonation of delay (2513 days) to restore an appeal dismissed in default on 15/04/2017. She alleged her son Devanand misled her by claiming the appeal was pending while colluding with the opposing party. The court rejected her application, finding she failed to establish "just and sufficient cause." The court noted that Anusayabai herself actively participated in the original trial, filed written statements, and was aware of execution proceedings filed in 2022, undermining her claim of ignorance. The judgment emphasized that parties must diligently pursue their cases and that long inaction demonstrates negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case