Jankiram Narayan Dindarkar vs Krushna Lingappa Asankar Advocate - SAWARKAR PRASHANT KRUSHNARAO — 1/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 399,397. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th April 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHWS010000172021
Filing Number
14/2021
Filing Date
07-01-2021
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
07-01-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jankiram Narayan Dindarkar
Adv. Malas Santosh Kisanrao
Subhash Narayan Dindarkar
Suresh Narayan Dindarkar
Vatsalabai Sadashiv Dindarkar
Respondent(s)
Krushna Lingappa Asankar Advocate - SAWARKAR PRASHANT KRUSHNARAO
Chaitanya Harshvardhan Asankar
Shivappa Prabhuappa Mulange
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 01/2021 Decision: The Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order dated 23.09.2020 passed under Section 145 CrPC. The court held that criminal proceedings under Section 145 CrPC were not maintainable because a civil suit (RCS No. 298 of 2012) regarding the same disputed property was already pending before the civil court, where interim relief had been rejected. Key Reasoning: The court applied the principle from *Ram Sumer Puri Mahant v. State of U.P.* that parallel proceedings should not continue when civil courts are seized with the matter and parties can approach civil courts for protective orders. Allowing concurrent criminal proceedings would cause multiplicity of litigation and waste of judicial resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 01/2021 Decision: The Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order dated 23.09.2020 passed under Section 145 CrPC. The court held that criminal proceedings under Section 145 CrPC were not maintainable because a civil suit (RCS No. 298 of 2012) regarding the same disputed property was already pending before the civil court, where interim relief had been rejected. Key Reasoning: The court applied the principle from *Ram Sumer Puri Mahant v. State of U.P.* that parallel proceedings should not continue when civil courts are seized with the matter and parties can approach civil courts for protective orders. Allowing concurrent criminal proceedings would cause multiplicity of litigation and waste of judicial resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts