Gulabsha Pandusa Kanhed vs Ravindralal Harakchand Gurrathi — 500044/1989
Case under Public Trusts Act (maharashtra) Section 72. Disposed: Contested--REMANDED on 23rd March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS010000021989
Filing Number
500044/1989
Filing Date
09-10-1989
Registration No
500044/1989
Registration Date
12-10-1989
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REMANDED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gulabsha Pandusa Kanhed
Adv. K.B.Deshpande
Dhanyakumar Motiram Belokar
Adv. N.Z.Biyani
Respondent(s)
Ravindralal Harakchand Gurrathi
Motilal Virchand Gurrathi
Adv. K.B.Deshpande
Kantilal Virchand Shah
Motibai Manilal Gujrathi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge set aside previous orders from 1961 and 1975 by the Assistant and Joint Charity Commissioners regarding a public trust inquiry, finding that mandatory rules of natural justice were violated as no proper hearing was conducted. The court remanded the matter to the Assistant Charity Commissioner for fresh proceedings with proper notice and opportunity of hearing to all parties, noting the dispute had remained pending for approximately 70 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judge set aside previous orders from 1961 and 1975 by the Assistant and Joint Charity Commissioners regarding a public trust inquiry, finding that mandatory rules of natural justice were violated as no proper hearing was conducted. The court remanded the matter to the Assistant Charity Commissioner for fresh proceedings with proper notice and opportunity of hearing to all parties, noting the dispute had remained pending for approximately 70 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts