Pratiksha Nilesh Rewatkar vs State of Maharashtra — 12/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR090001432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karanja

Judge

1-C.J.J.D.-J.M.F.C. Karanja Gh.

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Karanja (Gh.)

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Pratiksha Nilesh Rewatkar

Adv. DHANDE DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Branch Manager, SBI Karanja Ghadge

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D.-J.M.F.C. Karanja Gh.

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

17-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate First Class allowed Pratiksha Rewatkar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the defreeze of her bank account and release of Rs. 15,390 that had been frozen during a police investigation into an online fraud case. The court found that the amount belonged to the applicant and she was entitled to its interim custody, with the condition that she produce the amount to the Investigation Officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class allowed Pratiksha Rewatkar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the defreeze of her bank account and release of Rs. 15,390 that had been frozen during a police investigation into an online fraud case. The court found that the amount belonged to the applicant and she was entitled to its interim custody, with the condition that she produce the amount to the Investigation Officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case