Pratiksha Nilesh Rewatkar vs State of Maharashtra — 12/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHWR090001432026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
133/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karanja
Judge
1-C.J.J.D.-J.M.F.C. Karanja Gh.
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Karanja (Gh.)
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pratiksha Nilesh Rewatkar
Adv. DHANDE DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Branch Manager, SBI Karanja Ghadge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D.-J.M.F.C. Karanja Gh.
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class allowed Pratiksha Rewatkar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the defreeze of her bank account and release of Rs. 15,390 that had been frozen during a police investigation into an online fraud case. The court found that the amount belonged to the applicant and she was entitled to its interim custody, with the condition that she produce the amount to the Investigation Officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class allowed Pratiksha Rewatkar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the defreeze of her bank account and release of Rs. 15,390 that had been frozen during a police investigation into an online fraud case. The court found that the amount belonged to the applicant and she was entitled to its interim custody, with the condition that she produce the amount to the Investigation Officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts