State of Maha. vs Praful Wankhede — 1086/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR040014522018
Filing Number
1372/2018
Filing Date
10-10-2018
Registration No
1086/2018
Registration Date
10-10-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
253
Police Station
Police Station Wardha
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maha.
Adv. App for the state
Respondent(s)
Praful Wankhede
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Selu, Wardha acquitted defendant Prafulla Malushinkarav Wankhede on March 27, 2026, in a motor vehicle accident case filed under IPC Sections 279, 337, 304-A and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as key evidence including eyewitness testimony, accident site panchnama, and investigation details were insufficient or not properly documented. The accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of ₹15,000 for acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Selu, Wardha acquitted defendant Prafulla Malushinkarav Wankhede on March 27, 2026, in a motor vehicle accident case filed under IPC Sections 279, 337, 304-A and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as key evidence including eyewitness testimony, accident site panchnama, and investigation details were insufficient or not properly documented. The accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of ₹15,000 for acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts