APMC Sindy Rly vs Shreekrushna Gining And Pressing Nagpur — 400855/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR040011682015
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
400855/2015
Filing Date
07-10-2015
Registration No
400855/2015
Registration Date
07-10-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
APMC Sindy Rly
Adv. Rathi R. R
Respondent(s)
Shreekrushna Gining And Pressing Nagpur
Atul Talatule
Sunil Talatule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected two applications (Exh. 70 and Exh. 68) filed by the accused in cheque dishonor cases (u/s 138 NI Act) pending since 2015. The accused sought permission to adduce evidence from bank managers after closing his defense evidence and after the case was fixed for final arguments. The court found this to be a deliberate delay tactic, noting the accused had ample prior opportunity to examine witnesses but failed to do so without cogent reasons. The accused is directed to argue the case expeditiously with the case fixed for his final arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected two applications (Exh. 70 and Exh. 68) filed by the accused in cheque dishonor cases (u/s 138 NI Act) pending since 2015. The accused sought permission to adduce evidence from bank managers after closing his defense evidence and after the case was fixed for final arguments. The court found this to be a deliberate delay tactic, noting the accused had ample prior opportunity to examine witnesses but failed to do so without cogent reasons. The accused is directed to argue the case expeditiously with the case fixed for his final arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts