A P M. C Sindy Rly vs Shreekrushna Ginning Pressing Nagpur — 400854/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR040011672015
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
400854/2015
Filing Date
07-10-2015
Registration No
400854/2015
Registration Date
07-10-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A P M. C Sindy Rly
Adv. Rathi R. R
Respondent(s)
Shreekrushna Ginning Pressing Nagpur
Atul TAlatule
Sunil Talatule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The application filed by the accused seeking permission to examine a bank manager as a defense witness in a cheque dishonor case (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act) has been rejected. The court found that the accused had adequate opportunity to present this evidence earlier but deliberately failed to do so, and the application appeared to be a delaying tactic in an 8-year-old case. The accused has been directed to proceed with arguments expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The application filed by the accused seeking permission to examine a bank manager as a defense witness in a cheque dishonor case (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act) has been rejected. The court found that the accused had adequate opportunity to present this evidence earlier but deliberately failed to do so, and the application appeared to be a delaying tactic in an 8-year-old case. The accused has been directed to proceed with arguments expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts