Vasantao Marotrao Golhar vs Urmila Manohar Ashtankar and 3 — 26/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWR040006472021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
47/2021
Filing Date
20-07-2021
Registration No
26/2021
Registration Date
20-07-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasantao Marotrao Golhar
Adv. Wankhede M.M.
Respondent(s)
Urmila Manohar Ashtankar and 3
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 21-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Vasantrao vs. Urmila & Ors. (R.C.S. No.26/2021) Outcome: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The defendants are temporarily restrained from alienating the suit property until the final decision of the suit. The court found a prima facie case partly in the plaintiff's favor regarding apprehension of property alienation, though disputed the nature of the property (ancestral vs. self-acquired). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Vasantrao vs. Urmila & Ors. (R.C.S. No.26/2021) Outcome: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The defendants are temporarily restrained from alienating the suit property until the final decision of the suit. The court found a prima facie case partly in the plaintiff's favor regarding apprehension of property alienation, though disputed the nature of the property (ancestral vs. self-acquired). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts