Ashish Kose vs State of Maharashtra Thr State Excise Dept. — 17/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR040003092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

471

Police Station

Excise Officer, Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503
Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e),77,80,81,83,90, 108

Petitioner(s)

Ashish Kose

Adv. PATIL RAHUL RAMDASJI

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr State Excise Dept.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND JMFC, SELOO.

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed Ashish Kose's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Alto, which was confiscated in a liquor smuggling case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections. The magistrate granted custody upon execution of a ₹1,00,000 indemnity bond and imposed strict conditions: the applicant must not alter the vehicle, cannot use it illegally, must produce it on demand, and cannot transfer ownership until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Ashish Kose's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Alto, which was confiscated in a liquor smuggling case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections. The magistrate granted custody upon execution of a ₹1,00,000 indemnity bond and imposed strict conditions: the applicant must not alter the vehicle, cannot use it illegally, must produce it on demand, and cannot transfer ownership until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Seloo All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case