St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha vs Roshan Shivchand Thakur — 8106/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030110192025

Filing Number

11020/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

8106/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1804

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Shivchand Thakur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Wardha convicted the accused, Roshan Shivchandra Thakur, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for creating a public nuisance by illegally operating a vehicle on public roads on December 9, 2025. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, considering that this was his first offense and his difficult personal circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First Order

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8106/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Wardha convicted the accused, Roshan Shivchandra Thakur, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for creating a public nuisance by illegally operating a vehicle on public roads on December 9, 2025. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, considering that this was his first offense and his difficult personal circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case