G.R.P. Wardha vs Unknown — 947/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),SummaryA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR030091042025

Filing Number

9105/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

947/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

Excise Officer, Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),SummaryA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.R.P. Wardha

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unknown

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Wardha Railway Police Station's "A Summary" report for a theft case under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was accepted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class. The court found that despite sincere investigative efforts, neither the accused nor the stolen property could be located, with no reasonable prospect of recovery, and the informant raised no objection to closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  7. 30-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 947/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Wardha Railway Police Station's "A Summary" report for a theft case under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was accepted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class. The court found that despite sincere investigative efforts, neither the accused nor the stolen property could be located, with no reasonable prospect of recovery, and the informant raised no objection to closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case