G.R.P. Wardha vs Unknown — 931/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(c),SummaryA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHWR030090882025
Filing Number
9089/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
931/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
395
Police Station
Excise Officer, Wardha
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.R.P. Wardha
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Unknown
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha accepted the 'A Summary' closure report filed by Railway Police Station in a theft case under Section 305(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite sincere investigative efforts, the stolen property and accused remained untraceable with no likelihood of recovery, and the informant raised no objection to closure. The case was disposed of with orders to return any seized property to the original owner and send case papers to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
06-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
09-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
30-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
30-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 931/2025
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha accepted the 'A Summary' closure report filed by Railway Police Station in a theft case under Section 305(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite sincere investigative efforts, the stolen property and accused remained untraceable with no likelihood of recovery, and the informant raised no objection to closure. The case was disposed of with orders to return any seized property to the original owner and send case papers to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts