St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Sewagram vs Hrudaynath Ramchandra Waghmare — 4315/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(b),65(c),65(e),65(f). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030058792025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-07-2025

Filing Number

5879/2025

Filing Date

22-07-2025

Registration No

4315/2025

Registration Date

23-07-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

793

Police Station

Police Station Sewagram

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(b),65(c),65(e),65(f)

Petitioner(s)

St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Sewagram

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Hrudaynath Ramchandra Waghmare

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

11-03-2026

Disposed

13-02-2026

Evidence

16-12-2025

Evidence

25-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

25-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted the accused Hridaynath Ramchandra Bagmare of charges under Section 65(B)(C)(E)(F) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials (70 liters of raw liquor, 400 liters of fermented liquor, and 120 liters of country liquor) recovered from the accused's possession were genuinely those substances, as the chemical examination could not be conclusively linked to the seized materials. The court ordered the accused's release from custody with personal bond of Rs. 5,000, cancellation of bail bonds, and proper disposal of seized materials according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Hridaynath Ramchandra Bagmare of charges under Section 65(B)(C)(E)(F) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials (70 liters of raw liquor, 400 liters of fermented liquor, and 120 liters of country liquor) recovered from the accused's possession were genuinely those substances, as the chemical examination could not be conclusively linked to the seized materials. The court ordered the accused's release from custody with personal bond of Rs. 5,000, cancellation of bail bonds, and proper disposal of seized materials according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case