St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Sewagram vs Hrudaynath Ramchandra Waghmare — 4315/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(b),65(c),65(e),65(f). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR030058792025
e-Filing Number
12-07-2025
Filing Number
5879/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
4315/2025
Registration Date
23-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha
Judge
3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
793
Police Station
Police Station Sewagram
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Sewagram
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Hrudaynath Ramchandra Waghmare
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 25-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 25-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Hridaynath Ramchandra Bagmare of charges under Section 65(B)(C)(E)(F) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials (70 liters of raw liquor, 400 liters of fermented liquor, and 120 liters of country liquor) recovered from the accused's possession were genuinely those substances, as the chemical examination could not be conclusively linked to the seized materials. The court ordered the accused's release from custody with personal bond of Rs. 5,000, cancellation of bail bonds, and proper disposal of seized materials according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Hridaynath Ramchandra Bagmare of charges under Section 65(B)(C)(E)(F) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials (70 liters of raw liquor, 400 liters of fermented liquor, and 120 liters of country liquor) recovered from the accused's possession were genuinely those substances, as the chemical examination could not be conclusively linked to the seized materials. The court ordered the accused's release from custody with personal bond of Rs. 5,000, cancellation of bail bonds, and proper disposal of seized materials according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts