St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha vs Pappu Babaraoji Kamble — 4151/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030057052025

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

e-Filing Number

18-07-2025

Filing Number

5705/2025

Filing Date

18-07-2025

Registration No

4151/2025

Registration Date

18-07-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

4-3RD JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Pappu Babaraoji Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3RD JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

08-05-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

23-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court granted the interim custody application filed by Chhayabai Babaraoji Kamble for her seized Samsung refrigeridge. The applicant established ownership through bill and Aadhar card documents, and the court found that keeping the fridge stationary would diminish its value. The applicant must execute a Rs. 10,000 bond and comply with conditions including maintaining the fridge in proper condition, producing it as directed, and allowing the investigating officer to document it with photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted the interim custody application filed by Chhayabai Babaraoji Kamble for her seized Samsung refrigeridge. The applicant established ownership through bill and Aadhar card documents, and the court found that keeping the fridge stationary would diminish its value. The applicant must execute a Rs. 10,000 bond and comply with conditions including maintaining the fridge in proper condition, producing it as directed, and allowing the investigating officer to document it with photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case