State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram vs Mamun Alias Raja Rashid Faruki and 2 Advocate - Pandey A. K. — 473/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR030036822025
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
09-05-2025
Filing Number
3682/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
473/2025
Registration Date
13-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, WARDHA
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
Police Station Sewagram
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Mamun Alias Raja Rashid Faruki and 2 Advocate - Pandey A. K.
Agyat Eesam
Devashish Meghnath Sarkar
Adv. null
Samyak Aarun Dhawne
Adv. Pandey A. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, WARDHA
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a theft case (FIR 473/2025) where the complainant testified that on 10.02.2025, his brother's house was burglarized, resulting in the theft of ₹5,000 cash and two mobile phones (including a Samsung). The stolen items were recovered and returned to the complainant by the police station. The court recorded the witness statement and noted that the accused declined cross-examination. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a theft case (FIR 473/2025) where the complainant testified that on 10.02.2025, his brother's house was burglarized, resulting in the theft of ₹5,000 cash and two mobile phones (including a Samsung). The stolen items were recovered and returned to the complainant by the police station. The court recorded the witness statement and noted that the accused declined cross-examination. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts