St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha vs Kshitij Purushottam Naranje — 1210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 287. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 30th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR030021322026
Filing Number
2132/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
1210/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
251
Police Station
Police Station Wardha
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kshitij Purushottam Naranje
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Wardha convicted the 29-year-old accused under Indian Penal Code Section 287 (negligence in handling explosives) for recklessly using gas cylinders and welding equipment near a post office on March 7, 2026, causing danger to public safety. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, while emphasizing the severity of handling dangerous materials negligently and the need for public safety awareness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1210/2026
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Wardha convicted the 29-year-old accused under Indian Penal Code Section 287 (negligence in handling explosives) for recklessly using gas cylinders and welding equipment near a post office on March 7, 2026, causing danger to public safety. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, while emphasizing the severity of handling dangerous materials negligently and the need for public safety awareness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts