St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha vs Akash Bapuraoji Jadhav — 1192/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030021232026

Filing Number

2123/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1192/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

3-2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

192

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akash Bapuraoji Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The District Court (First Class) of Wardha, Maharashtra dismissed the criminal case against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court held that under the Indian Penal Code Section 215 (2023) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285, the accused was entitled to acquittal as the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, and ordered the release of the accused person accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1192/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court (First Class) of Wardha, Maharashtra dismissed the criminal case against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court held that under the Indian Penal Code Section 215 (2023) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285, the accused was entitled to acquittal as the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, and ordered the release of the accused person accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case