St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Ramnagar vs Shubham Ishwar Waghade — 1191/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030021222026

Filing Number

2122/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1191/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

Police Station Ramnagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Ramnagar

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Ishwar Waghade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court found the accused, Shubham Ishwar Vaghmade (26 years old), guilty under Indian Penal Code Section 285 for rash and negligent conduct involving a vehicle on a public road on 30/01/2026, which caused obstruction and danger. The First Class Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with simple imprisonment for one day in default, and issued a written order with one copy provided to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Shubham Ishwar Vaghmade (26 years old), guilty under Indian Penal Code Section 285 for rash and negligent conduct involving a vehicle on a public road on 30/01/2026, which caused obstruction and danger. The First Class Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with simple imprisonment for one day in default, and issued a written order with one copy provided to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case