R.P.F. Wardha vs Dipak Pradip Kumar Bhunia — 1103/2026
Case under Railway Act, 1989 Section 144,147. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWR030019812026
e-Filing Number
01-03-2026
Filing Number
1981/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
1103/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
231
Police Station
Railway Protection Force
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.P.F. Wardha
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipak Pradip Kumar Bhunia
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Railway Protection Force filed a complaint against the accused under Section 147 of the Railways Act. The accused appeared in court, received copies of the case documents, and after reviewing them, voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, satisfied with the voluntariness and willingness of the accused's plea, convicted him under Section 147 of the Railways Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with simple imprisonment for 2 days in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1103/2026
Summary The Railway Protection Force filed a complaint against the accused under Section 147 of the Railways Act. The accused appeared in court, received copies of the case documents, and after reviewing them, voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, satisfied with the voluntariness and willingness of the accused's plea, convicted him under Section 147 of the Railways Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with simple imprisonment for 2 days in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts