St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha vs Sachin Vittalrao Kawale — 749/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030013352026

Filing Number

1335/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

749/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Vittalrao Kawale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Maharashtra Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Section 11(1), and imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with imprisonment as ordered by the lower court. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused committed animal cruelty and dismissed the appeal, affirming that the previous judgment was legally sound and properly supported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First Order

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First Order

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 749/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Maharashtra Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Section 11(1), and imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with imprisonment as ordered by the lower court. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused committed animal cruelty and dismissed the appeal, affirming that the previous judgment was legally sound and properly supported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case