Yugandhar Manoj Karlekar vs St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha Advocate - App D. P. Kothari — 291/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th May 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR030009112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

911/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

291/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

1870

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Yugandhar Manoj Karlekar

Adv. MOON BHARAT PUNDLIKRAO

Respondent(s)

St. of Mah. Thr. P.S.Wardha Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor) D. P. Kothari

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JT. CJJD JMFC WARDHA.

16-05-2026

Disposed

13-05-2026

Reply/Say

11-05-2026

Reply/Say

05-05-2026

Reply/Say

28-04-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the applicant Yugandhar Karlekar's supratnama application and ordered release of his seized Honda Dream Yuga motorcycle, as the applicant established ownership through his deceased father's registration certificate and other documents, with both the investigating officer and prosecutor not objecting. The court imposed conditions including execution of a supurtnama bond with Rs. 50,000 forfeiture clause, submission of vehicle photographs, non-transfer of the vehicle until trial conclusion, and production on court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant Yugandhar Karlekar's supratnama application and ordered release of his seized Honda Dream Yuga motorcycle, as the applicant established ownership through his deceased father's registration certificate and other documents, with both the investigating officer and prosecutor not objecting. The court imposed conditions including execution of a supurtnama bond with Rs. 50,000 forfeiture clause, submission of vehicle photographs, non-transfer of the vehicle until trial conclusion, and production on court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case