Sai Shradha Deoli Urban Co Operative Credit Society Deoli vs Kunal Narendra Taywade — 282/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Awaiting Notice Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHWR030005002026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

500/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Wardha

Judge

3-2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Deoli

Year

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.Sai Shradha Deoli Urban Co Operative Credit Society Deoli

Adv. HIWARE RASHMI VASANTRAO

Respondent(s)

1.Kunal Narendra Taywade

Case History

11-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
09-Apr-2026

Awaiting Notice

2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The court issued process under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the accused Kunal Taywade for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint by Sai Shradha Deoli Urban alleged that the accused issued a dishonored cheque due to insufficient funds and failed to pay within the statutory notice period. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed after verifying the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Awaiting Notice

2Nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Wardha.
19-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
15-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court issued process under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the accused Kunal Taywade for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint by Sai Shradha Deoli Urban alleged that the accused issued a dishonored cheque due to insufficient funds and failed to pay within the statutory notice period. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed after verifying the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.