State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi vs Shubham @ Prayog Prakashrao Panbude 01 Advocate - Umate P.V. — 107/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(A),376(D),376(2)(N),323,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHWR010019402023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

21st May 2026

Filing Number

974/2023

Filing Date

11-12-2023

Registration No

107/2023

Registration Date

11-12-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

FIR Details

FIR Number

1156

Police Station

Police Station Arvi

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,366(A),376(D),376(2)(N),323,506,34
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section 3(2)(V),3(2)(va),3(1)(w)(i),3(1)(w)(ii)
JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT Section 75,77

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Shubham @ Prayog Prakashrao Panbude 01 Advocate - Umate P.V.

Ashfaque Akbar Shaha

Adv. Rathi Roshan R.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

07-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

27-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

23-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

15-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

15-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's application under section 348 of BNSS to examine Assistant Chemical Analyzer Nutan S. Pawade as a witness in this POCSO Act case. Despite the accused's objection, the court found the analyzer's evidence regarding chemical and DNA analysis reports of biological samples to be material and necessary. Witness summons were accordingly issued to the prosecution witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's application under section 348 of BNSS to examine Assistant Chemical Analyzer Nutan S. Pawade as a witness in this POCSO Act case. Despite the accused's objection, the court found the analyzer's evidence regarding chemical and DNA analysis reports of biological samples to be material and necessary. Witness summons were accordingly issued to the prosecution witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case