Narayan Taksande 01 vs Smt. Manjulabai Tamgadge 04 Advocate - Khare A. R.. — 100179/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHWR010019122015

Arguments

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

101040/2015

Filing Date

08-10-2015

Registration No

100179/2015

Registration Date

09-10-2015

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

7-DISTRICT JUDGE-4 AND ADDI. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96

Petitioner(s)

Narayan Taksande 01

Adv. Selkar S. A.

Gautam Taksande(Legal Heir) 2.

Smt. Anita Goutam Taksande

Adv. Selkar S. A.2.

Ravindra Goutam Taksande

Adv. Selkar S. A.2.

Swapnil Goutam Taksande

Adv. Selkar S. A.2.

Ashwini Ratanpal Khairkar

Adv. Selkar S. A.

Respondent(s)

Smt. Manjulabai Tamgadge 04 Advocate - Khare A. R..

Sevak Taksande(Legal Heir)

Rupchand Taksande

Smt. Yashoda Kamble

Gautam Mahadeo Taksande

Hearing History

Judge: 7-DISTRICT JUDGE-4 AND ADDI. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

11-03-2026

Arguments

05-02-2026

Arguments

18-12-2025

Arguments

20-11-2025

Arguments

09-10-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

28-11-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Court set aside the abatement against Appellant No. 2 (deceased Gautam Taksande) in this partition suit appeal, holding that all parties in a partition suit are necessary parties and stand on equal footing. Appellant No. 1 was directed to add Appellant No. 2 as Respondent No. 5 through his legal representatives, with liberty to seek consequential amendments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court set aside the abatement against Appellant No. 2 (deceased Gautam Taksande) in this partition suit appeal, holding that all parties in a partition suit are necessary parties and stand on equal footing. Appellant No. 1 was directed to add Appellant No. 2 as Respondent No. 5 through his legal representatives, with liberty to seek consequential amendments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case