State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Kharangna vs Aanaji alias Maroti Lakshman Shendare Advocate - LADC Adv. Verma D.M., LADC Adv. Verma D.M. — 89/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

List of Witness Next hearing 29-May-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHWR010017262025

Filing Number

812/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Registration No

89/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

4-District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

450

Police Station

Police Station Kharangana

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Kharangna

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aanaji alias Maroti Lakshman Shendare Advocate - LADC Adv. Verma D.M., LADC Adv. Verma D.M.

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    BAIL DENIED The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-3 and Special Judge (POCSO Act), Wardha rejected the bail application of accused Annaji @ Maroti Lakshamn Shendre in a case involving alleged attempted sexual assault on a minor boy under sections 96 of BNS and sections 4, 8, 12 of POCSO Act. The Court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the FIR was lodged promptly, medical evidence corroborated the assault with visible injuries to the victim, witness statements were recorded promptly, and the accused provided no explanation for the injuries—warranting bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  15. 26-Dec-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  16. 12-Dec-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  19. 30-Oct-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  20. 10-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  21. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge Wardha

  22. 12-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2025

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL DENIED The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-3 and Special Judge (POCSO Act), Wardha rejected the bail application of accused Annaji @ Maroti Lakshamn Shendre in a case involving alleged attempted sexual assault on a minor boy under sections 96 of BNS and sections 4, 8, 12 of POCSO Act. The Court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the FIR was lodged promptly, medical evidence corroborated the assault with visible injuries to the victim, witness statements were recorded promptly, and the accused provided no explanation for the injuries—warranting bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case