Sheikh Taufik Alias Tappu Sheikh Rafik vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Pulgaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 16/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3),(a),389. Status: Awaiting R and P. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHWR010016642025
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
e-Filing Number
19-08-2025
Filing Number
777/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
20-08-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
FIR Details
FIR Number
567
Police Station
Police Station Pulgaon
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheikh Taufik Alias Tappu Sheikh Rafik
Adv. Dilip mahantprasad verma
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Pulgaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Awaiting R and P |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting R and P |
| 17-12-2025 | Awaiting R and P |
| 20-11-2025 | Awaiting R and P |
| 18-11-2025 | Awaiting R and P |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appellate court suspended the conviction and sentence imposed on Sheikh Taufik for offences under IPC sections 354, 354-A, 354-C, and 506 Part-II, conditional upon executing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 10,000, furnishing a surety of equal amount, and depositing Rs. 5,000 as fine. The court reduced the originally imposed fine of Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 5,000, considering the appellant's poverty and the fact that he had already spent over five months in jail unable to pay the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appellate court suspended the conviction and sentence imposed on Sheikh Taufik for offences under IPC sections 354, 354-A, 354-C, and 506 Part-II, conditional upon executing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 10,000, furnishing a surety of equal amount, and depositing Rs. 5,000 as fine. The court reduced the originally imposed fine of Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 5,000, considering the appellant's poverty and the fact that he had already spent over five months in jail unable to pay the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts