Maya Raju Shiwarkar vs Shardaprasad Dwivedi Advocate - Sikkha S. A. — 77/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHWR010016122023
e-Filing Number
12-10-2023
Filing Number
816/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2023
Registration No
77/2023
Registration Date
13-10-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE WARDHA
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maya Raju Shiwarkar
Adv. Bahadure R. M.
Respondent(s)
Shardaprasad Dwivedi Advocate - Sikkha S. A.
Harvin Kaur Navnitsingh Kohali
Adv. Moon B.P.
National Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. Sikkha S. A.,Sikkha S. A.
Sneha Tushar Shiwarkar
Adv. Moon B.P.,Moon B.P. Moon B.P.
Shiva Tushar Shiwarkar
Adv. Moon B.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE WARDHA
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Lok Adalat, Wardha acquitted Manohar Ramaji Chikram of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 after he paid Rs. 12,740 for stolen electricity and Rs. 5,000 in compounding charges. MSEDCL (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited) filed a pursis consenting not to proceed further, leading to compounding of the offense under Section 152 of the Electricity Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The National Lok Adalat, Wardha acquitted Manohar Ramaji Chikram of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 after he paid Rs. 12,740 for stolen electricity and Rs. 5,000 in compounding charges. MSEDCL (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited) filed a pursis consenting not to proceed further, leading to compounding of the offense under Section 152 of the Electricity Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts