Adv. Bela Vinodkumar Tibdewal vs Nagnath Gangaram Yembadwar — 36/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHWR010015562024
e-Filing Number
26-09-2024
Filing Number
774/2024
Filing Date
26-09-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Adv. Bela Vinodkumar Tibdewal
Adv. Thombre V.S.
Respondent(s)
Nagnath Gangaram Yembadwar
Kailash Shankar Gadhe
Adv. Taori P. B.
Smt. Nalini Ravindra Dhanorkar
Adv. Choube P.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 09-03-2026 | Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
| 26-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Wardha Sessions Court dismissed an advocate's criminal revision challenging dismissal of her defamation complaint against three respondents under IPC sections 499-500. The court held that the respondent's wife's letter to her husband's superior fell within defamation exceptions (good faith disclosure to protect family interests under domestic violence proceedings), the public servants' show cause notice constituted official duty requiring state sanction for prosecution, and the complainant failed to produce evidence that the letter was actually published to third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Wardha Sessions Court dismissed an advocate's criminal revision challenging dismissal of her defamation complaint against three respondents under IPC sections 499-500. The court held that the respondent's wife's letter to her husband's superior fell within defamation exceptions (good faith disclosure to protect family interests under domestic violence proceedings), the public servants' show cause notice constituted official duty requiring state sanction for prosecution, and the complainant failed to produce evidence that the letter was actually published to third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts