State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Kharangna vs Ajay Janardhan Waghmare 02 Advocate - Baig M.W. — 58/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(2)(m),64(2)(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHWR010010252025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
459/2025
Filing Date
16-06-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
16-06-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
FIR Details
FIR Number
250
Police Station
Police Station Kharangana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Kharangna
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Ajay Janardhan Waghmare 02 Advocate - Baig M.W.
Ayub Sheikh Dilawar Sheikh
Adv. Baig M.W.
Tabbsum Ayub Sheikh
Adv. Baig M.W.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
Evidence
Evidence
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 08-04-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 24-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
The District and Sessions Court, Wardha heard an application by accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Ayub Dilawar Sheikh and Tabbasum Ayub Sheikh) for release on personal bond and time to furnish surety. The accused, a husband-wife pair and simple villagers, were arrested after previously remaining absent due to medical and health issues, and currently have no surety available. The court's detailed order on the application is partially visible but handwritten annotations obscure the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Sessions Court, Wardha heard an application by accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Ayub Dilawar Sheikh and Tabbasum Ayub Sheikh) for release on personal bond and time to furnish surety. The accused, a husband-wife pair and simple villagers, were arrested after previously remaining absent due to medical and health issues, and currently have no surety available. The court's detailed order on the application is partially visible but handwritten annotations obscure the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts