Farukh Abdul Sattar Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station Dahegaon Gosavi Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 34/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Status: Awaiting R and P. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHWR010009432023

Awaiting R and P

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-06-2023

Filing Number

495/2023

Filing Date

27-06-2023

Registration No

34/2023

Registration Date

28-06-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 374
MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

Farukh Abdul Sattar Shaikh

Adv. Gujarkar Rahul Rajendra

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station Dahegaon Gosavi Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

23-04-2026

Awaiting R and P

11-03-2026

Awaiting R and P

23-01-2026

Awaiting R and P

11-12-2025

Awaiting R and P

31-10-2025

Awaiting R and P

Interim Orders

01-07-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The appellate court suspended the three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on Farukh Abdul Sattar Shaikh for violating Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding the appeal grounds prima facie sound. The accused must execute a PR bond of ₹25,000 with surety of equal amount and regularly attend court until the appeal is disposed, while the fine of ₹25,000 remains intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court suspended the three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on Farukh Abdul Sattar Shaikh for violating Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding the appeal grounds prima facie sound. The accused must execute a PR bond of ₹25,000 with surety of equal amount and regularly attend court until the appeal is disposed, while the fine of ₹25,000 remains intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case