Sundarabai Lakshmanrao Kolhe vs Anandrao Mahadeorao Khekade 06 Advocate - Songade A.S. — 62/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHWR010007992022

Filing Number

494/2022

Filing Date

13-Apr-2022

Registration No

62/2022

Registration Date

16-Apr-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

1-Principal District Judge Wardha

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sundarabai Lakshmanrao Kolhe

    Adv. Raut S.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anandrao Mahadeorao Khekade 06 Advocate - Songade A.S.

  2. 2.Champatrao Mahadeorao Khekade

  3. 3.Dharmaji Mahadeorao Khekade

  4. 4.Shriram Daultrao Bhoyar

  5. 5.Lekhraj Daulatrao Bhoyar

  6. 6.Ajay Daulatrao Bhoyar

  7. 7.Kantaram Ganpatrao Arekar

    Adv. Songade AS

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  8. 15-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  12. 25-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  13. 05-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  14. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  16. 22-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  17. 27-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  18. 16-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  19. 04-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  20. 24-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  21. 12-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  22. 28-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  23. 26-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  24. 15-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  25. 11-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  26. 20-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  27. 25-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  28. 23-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  29. 19-Jul-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  30. 14-Jun-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  31. 10-Apr-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  32. 09-Mar-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  33. 10-Feb-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  34. 11-Jan-2023

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  35. 14-Dec-2022

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  36. 16-Nov-2022

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  37. 11-Oct-2022

    Preparation of Paper Book

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  38. 29-Sep-2022

    Awaiting R and P Lower Court

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  39. 01-Sep-2022

    Awaiting R and P Lower Court

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  40. 03-Aug-2022

    Reply/Say

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  41. 20-Jul-2022

    Order

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  42. 24-Jun-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Sundarabai Kolhe v. Anandrao Khekade (RCA No. 62/2022) Outcome: Application Rejected The Principal District Judge, Wardha rejected the appellant's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain respondents from dispossessing her from agricultural field survey No.97. The court found that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as she admitted not cultivating the land herself and her son (who actually cultivates it) is not a party to the proceedings. The court also determined that the balance of convenience does not favor the appellant and she would not suffer irreparable injury, thereby denying the temporary injunction relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  43. 24-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  44. 23-Jun-2022

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  45. 21-Jun-2022

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  46. 20-Jun-2022

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  47. 17-Jun-2022

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  48. 15-Jun-2022

    Reply/Say

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  49. 09-Jun-2022

    Reply/Say

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  50. 31-May-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Principal District Judge Wardha

  51. 19-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 13-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sundarabai Kolhe v. Anandrao Khekade (RCA No. 62/2022) Outcome: Application Rejected The Principal District Judge, Wardha rejected the appellant's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain respondents from dispossessing her from agricultural field survey No.97. The court found that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as she admitted not cultivating the land herself and her son (who actually cultivates it) is not a party to the proceedings. The court also determined that the balance of convenience does not favor the appellant and she would not suffer irreparable injury, thereby denying the temporary injunction relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case