Kishor Ganpat Adkine vs Sanjay Ganpat Adkine 09 Advocate - V.T.Gurunule Adv — 59/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWR010007082018
Filing Number
302/2018
Filing Date
21-04-2018
Registration No
59/2018
Registration Date
11-06-2018
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Ganpat Adkine
Adv. Khare A. R..
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Ganpat Adkine 09 Advocate - V.T.Gurunule Adv
Sheela Vijayrao Somalkar
Kalpana Babarao Hiwanj
Savita Marotrao Shende
Jyoti Vinayak Bhomle
Mamta Anilrao Balsaraf
Madhuri Manish Kawle
Yogita Pravinrao Karmore
Pratiksha Rajeshrao Wele
Bhaleraoji Morbaji Kokate (Dead)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Citation |
| 29-04-2026 | Citation |
| 16-04-2026 | Citation |
| 13-04-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court of Wardha allowed Regular Civil Appeal No. 38/2018 and partly allowed Regular Civil Appeal No. 59/2018, finding that the wills allegedly executed by deceased Ganpatrao Adkine and his wife Kasabai were not validly proved and are null and void. The court declared that all legal heirs (plaintiffs and defendant) are co-owners of the suit house with equal 1/6th shares each, rejecting claims based on the invalid wills and dismissing the possession suit filed by the beneficiary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court of Wardha allowed Regular Civil Appeal No. 38/2018 and partly allowed Regular Civil Appeal No. 59/2018, finding that the wills allegedly executed by deceased Ganpatrao Adkine and his wife Kasabai were not validly proved and are null and void. The court declared that all legal heirs (plaintiffs and defendant) are co-owners of the suit house with equal 1/6th shares each, rejecting claims based on the invalid wills and dismissing the possession suit filed by the beneficiary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts