State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi vs Pranay Vijayrao Bulbule 03 Advocate - Kashikar U. P., Rathi Roshan R., Rathi Roshan R.Rathi Roshan R., — 35/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(1),64(2)(Z)(T),70(2),78(2). Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHWR010007052025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

294/2025

Filing Date

08-04-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

08-04-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

Police Station Arvi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(1),64(2)(Z)(T),70(2),78(2)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Pranay Vijayrao Bulbule 03 Advocate - Kashikar U. P., Rathi Roshan R., Rathi Roshan R.Rathi Roshan R.,

Shubham Shankarrao Ladke

Akshay Chhaganrao Parave

Shivam Ashok Saarsar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

08-05-2026

Order on Exh

05-05-2026

Order on Exh

18-04-2026

Order on Exh

13-04-2026

Order on Exh

04-04-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Special Case No. 35/2025 (POCSO Act), the court directed the investigating officer to submit complete correspondence details regarding DNA analysis reports received from RFSL Nagpur and the status of mobile phone video analysis conducted on the accused's device. The court admitted prosecution reports (Serial Nos. 1-19) on record and ordered copies be provided to all accused persons, while noting delays in submitting forensic reports during pending bail applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Special Case No. 35/2025 (POCSO Act), the court directed the investigating officer to submit complete correspondence details regarding DNA analysis reports received from RFSL Nagpur and the status of mobile phone video analysis conducted on the accused's device. The court admitted prosecution reports (Serial Nos. 1-19) on record and ordered copies be provided to all accused persons, while noting delays in submitting forensic reports during pending bail applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case